Vigilance vs. Overreach in Social Media

Social media needs controlling, say the controllers...

SOCIAL MEDIA has become the place where many of us spend our time, share our lives and, increasingly, get our news, writes Frank Holmes at US Global Investors.

An estimated 12 billion combined hours are spent every day on these platforms, which now host over 5.3 billion unique "identities" or accounts.

ALT + DESCRIPTION: Number of Social Media Users With a Timeline of Select Platform Launches

With scaling like that, misinformation can spread like wildfire. We've all seen the headlines, the "fake news" and the deepfakes that make you question your own eyes.

For investors, this isn't just about the latest gossip. Misinformation (information that's false or inaccurate) and disinformation (fake news deliberately meant to confuse and deceive) can move markets. A recent study showed a correlation between social media interactions and short-term stock market movements.

This isn't just noise; it's noise with consequences. Last year, Nationwide Mutual Insurance found that more than a third of non-retired investors aged 18-54 acted on financial information from the internet or social media that turned out to be misleading or incorrect.

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) further complicates matters. We've already seen instances of AI-generated images causing market jitters, such as when someone posted fake images of an explosion near the Pentagon last year. As AI technology advances, distinguishing fact from fiction will become increasingly more challenging.

It's no surprise that Americans are expressing a historic lack of confidence in news media and issuing calls for increased regulation of online content.

ALT + DESCRIPTION: Two in Five Americans Have No Confidence in News Media

However, we must be extremely cautious about how we approach this issue.

Governments, in their wisdom or perhaps in their panic, have decided to step in, and they're not just playing referee. They're threatening to be the players, coaches and umpires all at once.

Take the recent violence in the United Kingdom. False rumors quickly spread about the identity of the man who allegedly attacked and killed two British girls on July 29, leading to nationwide riots and the arrest of over 1,000 people. So far, two men have been sentenced to months in prison for their activity on social media.

While it's understandable that authorities want to crack down on those inciting violence, the British government's threats have, in my opinion, gone too far. London's police chief has even suggested that American citizens may be extradited from the US to the UK to face charges for online comments. This is a dangerous overreach that sets a troubling precedent.

Similarly, the European Union's warning to Elon Musk about content moderation on X (formerly Twitter) ahead of his interview with former President Donald Trump last week smacked of attempted censorship. I agree that these platforms should have policies against explicitly illegal content, but vague "hate speech" laws are a slippery slope that can easily be abused.

Here's my take: Yes, misinformation is a problem. It can contribute to real-world chaos, from market fluctuations to societal unrest. But the solution isn't to throw the baby out with the bathwater. We need to be smarter, not just louder.

That starts with educating ourselves. In the investment world, we live by "trust, but verify." It's time we apply this thinking to our information diet by fact-checking the news as though our portfolios depend on it. And just like our portfolios, it's important to diversify where we get our news.

Having said that, I believe that if a social platform is going to moderate content, it must do so transparently. Let's know the rules of the game. Vague threats of "hate speech" without clear definitions? That's like playing chess where the rules change every move.

Benjamin Franklin wisely said that those who would give up their liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. The challenges of being an informed citizen and investor in today's information landscape are real, but I don't believe they justify heavy-handed government intervention.

Misinformation is a beast, but so is overreach. Let's stay vigilant, think critically and remember that the free flow of information – even when it's occasionally messy – is essential for both healthy markets and healthy democracies.

Stay invested, stay informed and most importantly, stay free.